International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

The Week Number Two Page 2 Fritish Industrial Notes 40-hour Week and “equal Pay" for Coachpuilders

The Week Vol. 1, No. 2, 8 January 1964 · p. 4 of the scan · 219 words

The scan: The Week v1 no2.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.

About 20,000 workers making tuses, luxury coaches and motor bodies are to have a 40-hour week next year and pay increases as from January 6 of between 4 and 5%. In addition a certain msasure of parity between men and w..en is to be introduced, The new wage rate for women will be the same as that for labourers in the industry (4/634 per hour) tut since the women concerned aro semi-skilled — workers the settlement does not give “equal pay" under a strict inter pretation.

Alfred Roberts, goneral secretary of the National Union of Vehicle Builders, has described the agreement as “quite an advance." Certainly it will have the effect of increasing the pressure on engineering employers to concede the 40-hour week and equal paye HOUSE OF LAY-ABOUTS? from a London correspondent

Mandrake, in his column in the Sunday Tolegraph of December 27 had an interesting item on how British peers earn (or don't earn) their living. Amongst those with inheritable titl%s (this includes baronets) and even excluding those aged 75 or more, it seems that “over one-third have never followed any gainful occupation, and another 25% have already retired from work." In other words, even disregarding the very old title holders, "less than 40% are currently in jobs; and among this minority nearly half are company directors."

← Don't Let Right Wing Officials Squash Young Socl\lists' LobbyHow Fords Hope to Keep Halewood Happy →

Something wrong on this page?