st serinar, in Nottingham early in 1964, attracted a great deal of
on in the socialist press, and brought together over 60 national celeg-
and a number of Nottingham trade unionists to consider a numder of repers ~ne possibilities for the extension of democracy in the nationalised induc: ies, end for an aggressive, democratic reply to the technocratic pressures ran incomes policy. It attracted substantial academic support, and it sisted in hammering out the strategies which have consistently been advocated in fne Veek and Voice of the Unions ever since, of posing against the demand nat the unions be increasingly integrated into the State machinery for control industrial relations, which has been an insistent theme of all the incomes clicy propaganda of the Wilson-Brown team, the counter-proposal of a movement for workers! control, This movement took shape around the call for complete and democratic accountability of all industrial organisations to their wrkpeople, for the ‘opening of the books’ and for the abolition of business secrecy,