International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

Double Disaster at Fife

The Week Vol. 8, No. 11, c. 14 September 1967 · p. 9 of the scan · 225 words

The scan: The Week v8 no11.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.

from David Robinson, The Michael Pit, under the Firth of Forth, one of Britain's 50 priority pits, employed 2,070 men at the time of the fire om Saturday morning in which nine miners were killed, After preliminary talks between the NUM and the Coal Board it was estimated that areund 700 men will be redeployed in the nearby pits of Seafield and Frances whose developments are being advanced to absorb them. Another 150 men will be found jobs in five pits further afield, with a small number retained at Michael pit itself, But this would still leave well over 1,000 men without jobs. Twelve thcusand miners' jobs have been lost in the past six years and before last week's tragedy the unemployment figures had already risen to 4 per cent in the Pife area, Government encouragement to the building of new industry has resulted in the influx of a number of electronic firms. However, a large proportion of their staff is female and so this has had little effect in reducing unemployment among former mine-workers, The Scottish NUM is calling on the Coal Board to retain the 1,100 to 1,200 men at the Michael Pit until it is reopened, no matter how long this takes. The wion's vice-president, Michael McGahey, said after an executive meeting,"We want an assurance that the pit will be fully restored."

← Selectivity in Housing?Political Notes →

Something wrong on this page?