International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

Richard Fletcher

The Week Vol. 7, No. 3, c. 19 January 1967 · pp. 8-9 of the scan · 213 words

The scan: The Week v7 no3 17th February 1965.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.

Director LCS

THE WEEK — Feb. 17, 1965 Package Deal for Builders N the building industry, under the 1963 settlement on wages, there is provision for the cost-of-living settlement in March (in previous years, that has been in February) and for the final settlement under the agreement of 23d. per hour for craftsmen and td. for labourers in November, 1965. Already there are ‘demands for a substantial increase to be submitted immediately the current agreement expires. There are some unions, of course, who want to submit a claim at once, but all indications ‘show that the 1963 settlement will run the full course. This raises two questions—one, should there be

another package deal or long-term

agreement, and if so, what sort of a

submission should be made and for

how much? This question should

exercise the minds of branches; mem-

bers, and conferences,’ and they

should not be long delayed consider-

ing the matter. The second question

is the 40-hour week and the demand

for its implementation. This, of

course, does not have to wait for the

‘termination of the existing agree-

ment. However, these questions in

my view, will have to be answered

in 1965. It is as well to get on dis-

cussing them now.

The clear implications of the need

← peg pricesOxon Farmers reject Incomes Policy →

Something wrong on this page?