Experience showed that additional legal sanctions against unionists breaking with procedures and agreements were not likely to lead to any reduction in strikes, Mr, A.J. Marsh says in a Paper authorised by the Royal Commission on Trade Unions and Employers' Associations. Mr. Marsh, a senior research Fellow in industrial relations at Oxford, contends that attempts to enforce procedures and agreements in Britain would involve both a change in their character and in the attitude of the parties towards them. "Certainly disputes would become much more a matter for legal decision, although there is nothin in the British legal tradition which would suggest that lawyers are adept at handling the problems arising out of industrial relations. Procedures themselves would have to be largely re-written in a much more rigid way, particularly at shop floor level. It is not that strikes are not a problem, but is seems more useful to study the actual circumstances of strikes, rather than rely on overall disciplinary rémedies backed by law," he argued.
The WeekThe Week Vol. 6, No. 15, 27 October 1966
Legal Control of Strikes Ineffective
The scan: The Week v6 no15.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)
Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.
← Building Sites to Stop on November 7A Socialist Solution for Th? Motor Industry →