International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

Croydon C.S.E. publishes rents facts

The Week Vol. 5, No. 9, 3 March 1966 · p. 8 of the scan · 197 words

The scan: The Week v5 no9.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the issue's contents list (match 0.95).

from Stan Mills Croydon Centre for Socialist Education has published facts and figures for use in the current dispute about the proposed rent increases in Croydones This is an excellent activity for a C.S.E, branch to carry out and it is to be hoped that other branches will find the ways and means of doing similar things, The Croydon C.S.E, leaflet reads: "Proposed increases: renging from 40-60% - an average of about £1 per week. Number of dwellings completed by November, 1965: 15,239. Cost of three- bedroomed house: £3, 650#£3,725 excluding land.

£4,500 including land.

Loan charges per house: £300 per annulle

Cost rent:(excluding Exchequer subsidy)

£6.16. 6d per weeks

Loan charges= approx imately 5/6 of cost

rente Assuming loan over 60 years, real cost of a single house approximately £21,700. Total loan charges 1955/56: £435,780 Loan charges= approximately }instalment 1964/65: £1,174, 664 on principal and ¢ interest. 1968/49; £2,478.000 Loan charges make up approximately 2/3 of total expenditure on Housing Revenue accounte Income from rent 1955/56: £438,722 1964/65: £1, 325,914 1968/69: £3, 247,500 Total income 1968/69: £3,633, 350 Rate Subsidy Ex3nequer subsidy 1955/56: £46 ;192 £113,924 1959/60: £55,000 it 1964/65: £25,908 £220, 398 1968/69: ~ £466,700

← London Vietnam Solidarity meetingWhere Does Yor M.e. Stand on Anti~trade Union Law? →

Something wrong on this page?