International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

Labour's Policy in Opposition

· The Week Vol. 5, No. 7, 17 February 1966 · pp. 9-10 of the scan · 353 words

The scan: The Week v5 no7.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.

The Labour Party's Speakers! Notes for the 1959 General Election (printed and published by Transport House) contains the following extract from the Foreign Affairs section dealing with Vietnam, No comment on the extract is required from me, it speaks for itself: (my emphasis throughout) "Vietnam A very dangerous situation exists in the former French Indo-Chinese colony of Vietnam. By the 1954 Peace Treaty all foreign troops were to be withdrawn from both North and South Vietnam within a short period and the local troops were to re-group north and south of the 17th parallel. Free elections were to be held by July 1956 to unite the whole country. The British Government, as one of the co-chairmen of the Geneva Conference, has had a special responsibility, together with the International Supervisory Commission, to see that the terms of the Treaty were carried out. Yet what has happened? "In both north and south separate governments have been established, The north has continually expressed its willingness to hold all-Vietnamese elections in accordance with the Peace Treaty - again and again the south has refused. Yet not a squeak of protest from the Tories = supposedly the upholders of the 1954 settlement. Indeed, by recognising, and having diplomatic relations with, the south and not with the north, the Tories are conniving at the breach of Treaty,

Vietnam - Labour's policy in opposition continued/

"Is all this important? The Labour Party thinks that it is: 1. By refusing to honour a specific treaty obligation to hold free elections, which the Communists may win, in Vietnam, the Western Powers very much weaken their position in demanding, for example, free all~German elections which they expect to win, 2. The 1954 Conference sat Geneva was welcome for broader reasons than simply relief that the Indo-Chinese was was ended, It was the first confer ence between East and West that met with success, It is clearly in the interests of both great power blocs to ensure that once a settlement of a particular problem is achieved it is adhered to, This the only way to ensure a gradual growth of international confidence."

← Wall Street Peace PanicHelp the Campaign for Solidarity with the People of Vietnam →

Something wrong on this page?