The thin end of the wedge on Incomes Policy?

The scan: The Week v5 no12.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the issue's contents list (match 0.70).

The Union's Genernl Conference"(the Teilor & Garnent Workers! Union) "in June last year accepted the Governient's Prices and Incomes Policy with reservationse I hve now to say that there are developments in the inplenentation of this policy which in ny opinion are ininical to the progressive development of an equitable incomes policye I have recognised that there is a case for a wages policy, and if reference is nade to the records of the Trade Union Congress, it will show that I was requesting nany years ago that the T.U.C. should accept a bigger involvenent in the wages fields I strongly object to provisions now included in the Bill on Prices and Encones, particularly the punitive provisionse I an convinced that a Voluntary incones policy cannot survive by the side of legislation which constitutes” @ threat to the voluntary systell.e What is” Ket e, 1 an i convino= 6d that leg ae wilt wreck the” Seefbliites oP ihe of the progressive ; developn Of & sound ‘and “equitab le voluntary 3 sSnenemony ee “and therefore,