International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

A Letter on the North Hull By-6leution

The Week Vol. 5, No. 1, 4 January 1966 · p. 11 of the scan · 178 words

The scan: The Week v5 no1.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.

seeel cannot agree with your able defence of the view that socialists should work for the success of the official Labour Party candidate in the North Hull by-election, You contend that the left can only hope to affect policy on Vietnam, or other scandals, if the present Government is confirmed in office, Let us agree for present purposes that all the "Radical" votes come from electors who would otherwise have voted Labour. To show that your conclusions would still be wrong, please imagine two possible results of the by-election (the second I fear more far-fetched than the first): (a) Richard Gott gets only fifty votes, while Macnamara holds or increases the Labour Party votes (b) Richard Gott get 5,000 votes and Macnamara loses the seat.

Then just ask - which result would encourage Wilson to suppose that he has overwhelming popular support for his present policies, and which might persuade him that he has to change course sharply if he is to be able to g0 on seeing the Queen every few days?

Yours ete,

Tony Young (Ilford)

← The Soviet Union, China and Vietnam - Charges and CounterchargesBalance of Payments Much Worse in 3i Quarter →

Something wrong on this page?