International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

Repercussions of Redundancy

· The Week Vol. 3, No. 7, 18 February 1965 · p. 5 of the scan · 409 words

The scan: The Week v3 no7 18th February 1965.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: large-type headline; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.

EI was decided that the large scale i dismissals from BMC in Birmingham during 1956 “‘were worthy of ‘academic’ attention” and Dr. Kahn and a host of research assistants set about examining the repercussions of redundancy. This book* is a detailed report of these findings. On Wednesday, June 27th, 1956, the British Motor Corporation announced that as from Friday, June 29th, there would be a reduction in its labour force of some 124%. The brunt of these dismissals fell on Birmingham. The extent and suddenness of the lay-off was unprecedented in post-war Britain. The car workers’ unions called a strike, but the men were so demoralised that only about half of them came out. - Dr. Kahn examines the difficulties that these, often skilled, men had in regaining employment. Some 27% of the men were unemployed for over a month, while at the end of two months 15% were still not placed. of little help and succeeded in helping only 15% to find jobs. It has often been the contention of some socialists that sudden, catastrophic events like the Birmingham dismissals would tend to radicalise those sections of workers involved. What evidence that Dr. Kahn presents seems to point to the reverse. In spite of the fact that 45% of those who applied for help to their trade

unions were found jobs, there was a very obvious slump in regard for the unions. Twenty per cent. of men who had been trade unionists before the sackings refused to rejoin on reemployment. Amongst the remarks made by those who refused to rejoin were that “after paying 1/7 a week for two years, he had not got his money’s worth.” Some 45% of the sample decided that, in the event of redundancy, coloured and foreign workers should be asked to go first irrespective of length of service. Even more depressing than this to socialists is that only 27% of the dismissed workers believed that unemployment was not inevitable. The social nature of the economy was not remotely grasped. Amongst this group, however, nearly two-thirds advocated work sharing. Only a very small minority saw the problem as being political: “under the present system an employer can decide he has made enough profit and close down; there should be some planning at national level.” If Dr. Kahn’s book can give us a message, then surely it must be that mass sackings will be continued as long as the majority accept them as inevitable.

← £ = 4/- — ChancellorEaster March if - OS →

Something wrong on this page?