International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

Bosses Talk Tough

· The Week Vol. 3, No. 10, 10 March 1965 · p. 3 of the scan · 428 words

The scan: The Week v3 no10.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.

TATEMENTS by two employers who are at present in conflict with the trade unions indicate a hardening of attitude. Mr. Walter Womar, general manager of the Potteries Motor Traction Company, made a statement at Stoke-on-Trent on March 4th. He claimed that the provincial bus companies would price themselves out of business if the busmen’s demands were met. Mr. Womar, whose crews have struck three times, said that granting the demands would mean a serious reduction in existing services and an “astronomical increase” in fares. He added: “The minimum fare would have to be increased from 3d. to 5d. and all other fares proportionately. We may just as well put up the shutters. We will be pricing ourselves out of business.” On March 3rd, a representative of the Pressed Brick Makers’ Association claimed that the ban on overtime and week-end working by maintenance men in the fletton brick industry “will inevitably lead to loss of brick production on a mounting scale.” The employers were facing leapfrogging pay demands “‘with no prospect of their ever coming to a conclusion,” the statement went on. This “untenable position” was caused on the one hand by claims for increased differentials for Electrical Trades Union and Amalgamated Engineering Union members and demands for similar payments to restore the

balance for their employees in the

Transport and General Workers’

Union and National Union of

General and Municipal Workers.

In the circumstances the employers

had last month rejected an E.T.U.

and A.E.U. application, for an in-

crease in a 10/6 lieu bonus, or for

any increase in the differential for

maintenance workers, and ruled out

further negotiations on maintenance

workers’ pay “unless and until the

other unions concerned were present,”

the statement added. The mainten-

ance workers had decided to work

strictly to rule from March rst, and

essential maintenance work, normally

done at week-ends, was affected,

Of course we have all these argu-

ments before—back in the r1o-hour-

day campaign the employers claimed

that all their profit was earned after

to hours had been worked. The

significance of these statements how-

ever must be seen in relation to the

Government’s attitude towards an in-

comes policy, The very hardness

of the employers’ attitude would sug-

gest that perhaps they expect support

from the Government.

If Mr. Womar wants us to take

his claim about ‘being priced out of

business’ seriously he should give the

trade unions and rank and file bus-

men access to his books. The brick

manufacturers’ tactics of playing one

union against another should be met

by a united trade union front.

← Tgwu Slates Package DealJack Tanner →

Something wrong on this page?