Striking apprentices in Manchester had occasion to complain to the Manchester and Salford Trades Council about the use by the police of dogs at their meetings and picket lines. After receiving the complaint the Trades Council wrote to the Chief Constable of Lancashire and protested. They described the action of the police as “a violation of civic rights" and “an interference with the freedom of public assemblies", The Chief Qonstable replied that "it was not the policy of his force to have dogs at strike meetings." He assured the Trades Council that this wouldn't happen agein and made the rather weak-sounding excuse that in "this instance a dog handler had gone to Trafford Park on relief duty; he should have left his dogs at the police stdion."
The WeekThe Week Vol. 2, No. 19, 26 November 1964
Lancashire Chief Constable apologises for
The scan: The Week v2 no19.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)
Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the issue's contents list (match 0.80).
← Trade union notes: A union mergerTed Hill on incomes policy discussions →