Last week a number of our readers received their copy later than usual. This was unavoidable as the G.P.0. discovered that the way we have been despatching The Week infringes one of their regulations, and all copies were returned to us the following day. We apologise for the delay, and hope that things will run smoothly now that we are complying with regulations, but the additional expense of envelopes for each copy givos added emphasis to our appeal in last week's issue for all the support our readers can give us, especially by winning us more subscribers.
The WeekThe Week Vol. 1, No. 9, 26 February 1964
Editorial Address
The scan: The Week v1 no9.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)
Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the issue's contents list (match 0.55).
← [Untitled, contents page]The Week Number Nine Page 1 Editorial Notes Defend Cypriot Shlif~determination →