International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

attempt tho rovision of the oxisting lam, in tho int clarity

The Week Vol. 1, No. 5, 29 January 1964 · p. 5 of the scan · 184 words

The scan: The Week v1 no5.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: large-type headline; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.

We mast see to it that it retmins uncomfortable, even as we demand reforms to protect our membership.

But this matter cannot ba left to legislators alone, A huge Prepaganda compaign of explanation of the issues must be Initiated by the unions, and members mist be advised how to protect themselves from this new threat. One device which would moet those cases whers a strike needs ‘app mopriate notice! is that adopted: by French WOrkors, whe wore recently subjected to the ebligation + $0 submit long notice of any strike, They responded ty subaitting the ths notice 2 every day, eo thet their strikes became legal whenerar they Were y needed.

Now is the time for trade unionists to do their homework on such matters as this. Agreements must be carefully studied, and advance action to cover the backs of all the workers who sare likely to he axposed. This is not a matter which con be simply left to legal depart— mont of the 1c. (Hd. note: sea page four for Beonomist and Financial Pines comment on the Rodles vy. Barnard case

*

← The Week Numggr Five Page 1 Eritorial Notes an Appeal to Union Leaders and MembersThd Weex Nummer Five Page 2 Young Sogillist Totes Y.s, Chairman Recommended for Expulsion? →

Something wrong on this page?