International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

The Week Number Four Page 13 Economic Notes

The Week Vol. 1, No. 4, 22 January 1964 · p. 17 of the scan · 240 words

The scan: The Week v1 no4.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.

OVERSEAS STIRLING HOLDINGS from a London correspondent

The conomist quotes the Dank of Imgland Quarterly Bulletin, which, in its December issue, makes the fullest revelation of the size and distribution of sterling holdings for sighteen years. ‘Tho largest holders were (on June 30, 1963) Australia, Hongkong, Malaysia and the Porsian Gulf territories, whose combined holdings totalled £1, 307m, cach within the range of £200m. — £400m. The combined holdings of India, the Republic of Ireland and New Zealand amounted to £397m., each holding between £100m, — £200m." Of non-sterling countries, “only six countries, whose combined total was £399m.,; held over £50m., and only seven more held over £30n." The Economist points out that it is impossible to work out the exact figure for any one specific country from the information given, but it concludes: “Half of all sterling balances owned by sterling area countries, or about one third of «the total, are in tho hands of the former African colonies, the Gulf territories and countries like Malaysia, Brunei, Hongkong and Turma, These countries have in common a desperate desire to develop their economies - a desire that seems certain to draw down their sterling balances."

Socialists will note the contradiction between the economic needs of Dritein's ex-colonies and Dritish economic, military and foreign policies, demanded by the “defence of sterling" — such as military involvement in the Persian Gulf and Malaysia, the very areas which must withdraw sterling to develop.

← Imports and exports at peak in December, tradeOverseas sterling holdings →

Something wrong on this page?