International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

The British Economy Number Four Page 12

The Week Vol. 1, No. 4, 22 January 1964 · p. 16 of the scan · 211 words

The scan: The Week v1 no4.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.

PRE-ELECTION BOOM? from an Oxford correspondent

There is every indication that economic activity will increase during the next fow months. Last summer it appeared that capital equipment expenditure would be increasing at a rate of 5% in 1964, but now this estimate has risen to 10%, In addition to this the Goverment has announced an increase in state investment of £400m, This combinatjon of incrdnses. makes it probable that the economy will be overstimulated, in which case deflationary’ EY Aave to bo adopted later in the year. ly this time it seems alnost certain that the Labour Party will be in power, facing the necessity of a cut in capital expenditure. Unless it adopts some form of control to spread this over both private and public expenditure, the plans to develop the depressed areas would have to be cancelled, as this would be the only part of the economy where a drastic reduction in expenditure is possible. If the Labour Party did this however it would have to accept the political consequ~ ences of losing Sonfidence of the affected sectors of the working class.

The Labour Party will, therofore, be forced to decide quickly whether the economy is to be planned or manipulated out of each diffic-— ulty as it arises.

← based on Financial Times report CZECH INDUSTRY TO BE REORGANISIDImports and exports at peak in December, trade →

Something wrong on this page?