First, regarding our date of publication. Although the front is marked 21st May, the actual date is 22nd May. There is no great mystery about this discrepancy - it merely arises from the fact that even the editors of The Week sometimes take a holiday. Not only this, but the absence of a postal delivery on Whit Monday led to the delay of meyy valuablé articles, which could not just have appeared unless we brought out the issue one day late.
We also have to apologise to several contributors whose material we have not used in this issue. In prett¥°atl cases we plan to use these articles in issue number 22. Please do™Pét this put anyone off writing - as by far the best position is to have too many articles than just one too few. And, in any case, all unused material is carefully filed away and used for various referencese One last point, this time a more positive one!, we are pleased to report .more readers teking bulk supplies and a continuous increase in the number of subscribers.