International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

After July 6th Lichyning Strikes Way Be Tel Gal

The Week Vol. 1, No. 18, 30 April 1964 · p. 7 of the scan · 238 words

The scan: The Week v1 no18.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.

&

Rey SE

3 es

SERRE ne

ae

Professer Otte Kehn-Freund, professor of law at the University of Lendon (L.S.£.), writing in the April issue ef Jeurnal of General Federation ef Trade Uniens, warna that after July 6th etrikera whe de not give one week's notice of the intention to strike gay face the threat of damages. Prefessor Xahn-Freund, who is considered to be one of Britain's leading industrial law experts, came this conclusien after making a detailed atudy of the Reokee v. Barnard High Court Judgment. He says: “en July 6th, 1964, the Contracts ef Employment Act, 1963, will begin te operate, and by the terms of the Act, everyone whe has been in the employment of the same empleyer fer 26 weeks or more must give at least ene week's netice of termination of centract, After that date, and tf Reokea v. Barnard is allowed te stand, the threat ef damages will hang ever all these whe strike even fer a day witheut giving a week's notice..." Later in the article he expresses the opinien that the right te strike can now enly be restored by legislation, and that "it would probably have ‘te censist in a very shert statute amending the relevant sectiens of the 1906 Act s@ as to make it clear that intimidation, except by a threat of physical violence is not actionable if done in contemplation ef further-ance of a trade diepute.”

← Mating to Supporters: aRow Between Houghton and Civil Service Union Leader Over Civil Service Pay Trends →

Something wrong on this page?