International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

Greater Rate of Exploitation in the Coal Industry

The Bulletin Vol. 3, No. 8, 6 September 1963 · pp. 5-6 of the scan · 577 words

The scan: tb-v03n08-sep-6-1963.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the issue's contents list (match 0.93).

The following facts from the "Annual neport and Statenont of Accounts

of the National Coal Board" for the year 1962 show that less minors are

producing more. Hd. notas

In 1962, productivity rose by nearly 8%, the tonnage lost through

strikes and restrictions was almost halved, and a financial surplus was made

for the first time in six years, The outstanding feature of the year was the

spectacular rise in productivity, which increased at more than twice the 1961

rates the improvement compared favourably with that of British industry as

a whole, Wider and more efficient use of machines resulted in 20,000 fewer

men producing eight million more tons of cosl from 450 fewer coalfaces, The

tonnage lost through strikes and rostrictions amounted to only 0.6% of total

output and was, with the exception of 1959, the lowest for more than ten

years, Ey tho end of the year, transfers had been arranged for nearly 3,000

men from the northern Divisions to Yorkshire, the Midlanda and South Walos.

Recruitment became progressively easier in 1962 and fewer men left

the industry voluntarily than for somo years, the total wastage falling nearly

hy 14,000 to 60,700, Recruitment was purposely kept substantially below

wastage and the number employed was allowed to fall by 25,000 to 536,200,

fhe BURNT: cP S PEACE WITH GOVERIBIENT AND Dicks CHIMA from Hsinhua 4/ 9./63

"To stop the internal war and to restore peace is a question of prime importance for settling the various problems within the country." It is also a key issue in settling thess problems, Declared the leader of the advance peace delegation of the Burmese Communist Party, Ko Htay st 4 press conference in Rangoon on Septamber 3rd. The delegation arrived on August 26th.

Ko Htay said, “To sstablish internal & on the basis of genuine national democracy, each party must recongise the and both must reach ngree— mont through discussions on the basis of equality. For these rezsons, negotiations on tha basis of equality cannot be neglected, This is the only correct way. Former governments which pursued 2 policy of total annihilation had rejected proposals for negotiation and for this reason, the internal war which wes fanned up by the imperialists for opposing the people and Communism had been prolonged." He emphasised that imperialism and the remtionsaries within the country were using various shameless means to undermine the peace talks. “Therefore, we must hoighten our vigilance, The question of establishing genuine internal pence is not divorced from tha question of opposing imperialiam and the reactionaries within the country. That is to say if we want to ronlise internal peace, we mst firmly oppose imperialism and react— ionearies at home," He expressed support for the action taken by the Revolutionary Council against reactionaries in the country who were undermining internal peace,

Replying to 2 question on the Sino—Indian boundary question. Ko Htey seid, “China is a socialist country. I+ consistently observes the 5 principles of peaceful coexistance, It has also successfully and peacefully sottled with Burma and its other neighbouring countries through negotiations the boundary questions which have had been left over by history. But the Indian government has time and time again undermined the five principles of pesoetul coexistence.

On the question of the Moscow tripartito treaty, he said, "Ve éo not approve this treaty because it does not completely ban nuclear weapon tostse.." Answering a question on Khrushchov's "peaceful coexistence", Ko Htay said "I Cannot understand Khrushchov's 'peaceful coexistence,'"™

← Mr. Jay soya Labour would make Stock Exchange busierTho Guardian on Khrushchov's Visit to Yugoslavia →

Something wrong on this page?