with the SU in the Sino, Soviet dispute. The party daily "Land og Folk",l16th July, declared, "In our whole political work we have struggled to secure paaceful cosxistance, To prevant an atomic war is the euynane task of our time and tha géneral lina of tha communist
t oer eee ae One of the leading theoreticians of tho party, Gelius lund, (who is editor of the’ Facts about the Soviat Unio, which is Lemed by the Soviet “mbassy in Copenhagen)writes in "Land og Folk"19th July, "Discussion is ganerally a good thing, In the present example, however, the conflict is a disadvantage. The “hinese leaders have no positive or constructive proposal to make, It is not constructive to make oneself an opponent to gensural end complete international disarmament, or to attack peaceful coaxistense as the gon:ral line of comminist part; as." [oo Danish communist writer, Hans Scharfig,in an interview with the bourgeois paper"Information",states that, "Ye ccarcely know what the conflict rorlly is about, The policy of the SU seems most favourable to us, because it gives us more chance to avoid war. The Chinese only stick more to tha writings, mora to lisrx and Engels and probably do not reco, nize that sll these clover words were written bafora anyons thought of ths atomic bomb,"
During tha whole conflict “Land og Folk" has been very partial in its repo:t.. While the view points of the SU have been announced ie with large headlines, se,eral important Chinese declarations have either been omitted or drastically shortened.