International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

The Sino/Seviet Split

The Bulletin Vol. 3, No. 2, 16 July 1963 · pp. 3-4 of the scan · 188 words

The scan: tb-v03n02-jul-16-1963.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the issue's contents list (match 0.89).

There is no need to reiterate the arguments we have

put forward many times in the Bulletin on this dispute. The cards are now down, all pretence has been dropped as to who the main protagonists are in the arguments. ‘hilst, Khrushchoy and co, are wining and dining with Tory Lord Hailsham and the millionsire Harrinan "in a very friendly atmosphere", their relations with their fellow Communist, fellow Marxist-Loninets" could hardly be worse, The record of the Chinese in the latest stages of the polemic - although by no means failtless, ose, their misrepresentation of the Yugoslav positions - is much better than that of the Russians, The latter have been unwilling to reproduce Chinese mater ial and conducted a campaign against tho Chinese merely for putting forward their point of viow}; the Russians, too, have not ceased to misrepresent the essential views of the Chinese, However, the discussion itself will lead to a revitalisation of Marxist thought on a world scale and many of those who have become “Maoites", (or even, in some cases, "hrushchovites") have taken the first step on the road to creative Marxian,

LOdd

← Editorial notes: Wilson and Wage RestraintLondon Labour and tho Groek Royal Visit →

Something wrong on this page?