International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

Indian Planning Failure

The Bulletin Vol. 3, No. 19, 27 November 1963 · p. 10 of the scan · 232 words

The scan: tb-v03n019-nov-27-1963.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.

from the Financial Times 27/11/63

India's third 5 yoar plan is likely to fall short of alnost every torget when it ends in 1966, judging from an official report by the Plonning Commission published in New Delhi on Nov. 26th, Ths report, a mid-tom appreisal of the plan, has been placed before Parliament. It said tho country's plannod rate cf esonomic development in the prst two yore had fallen off seriously.

It put the blome mainly on set-backs tc agriculture caused by two bad harvesta, but also referred to "the now burdens and responsibilities" berne | since last year's border clash with China. The 200 page r-pert showed that tho . Snnucl rate of increase in the national income over thy past two years had boon only 26 Iby—e the ite. gi rise, This had been cancelled out hy the : population ingrenasa, which/Also estimated at 2.5%, ond may be as high as 24 Tie Industrial production incroased by only 8%, against 2 planned avarage rise of 11%, slthough somo individual industriszs had regicterad high expansion setet.

The report said food production had dropped over 2m, tons last year, but prospects for thia year's crop szemed good. However, figures given “ in ths report showed that the price index has risen 8% in the last nine months, with the bulk of the increase in the price of food, particularly rise and sugar,

← based on Militant article ALLIANCE FOR PROGRESS'?[Untitled, contents page] →

Something wrong on this page?