British and American C.P.'s back Russians

The Bulletin Vol. 2, No. 3, 19 January 1963 · p. 6 of the scan · 102 words

The scan: tb-v02n03-19-jan-1963.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the issue's contents list (match 0.80).

In a 5,000 word statement issued by the Executive Committee of the British Commmist Party, that body firmly cones down on the side of Khrushchov. The statement, issued 'with extreme reluctance', is little nore than a reiteration of the arguments of Ehrushchoy with the exzesption that it criticises the Chinese direct ly instead ef the ‘Albanions.' The U.Se Commnist Party statonent, reported in the Doily Worker of 14/1/63, seemed from the extracts given to much sharpor, Bese 1t charged the Chinese with 'dogmtisn nnd soctarinn repetition of phrases', and doseribed the policics of the Chinese Communist Party as “erroneous and anngarous. *

Something wrong on this page?