International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

Employers disappointed with T.U.C

The Bulletin Vol. 2, No. 20, 27 May 1963 · p. 4 of the scan · 178 words

The scan: tb-v02n020-may-27-1963.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the issue's contents list (match 0.61).

n its latest issue the British Confederation Pulloetin has an article which considers the T,U.C. raport on Swedish unions, I+ finc it regrettable that the T,U.C. has decided against a policy of "one industry - one union," and ozpresses disappointment that the publication of the report "was accompanied by the news that the general purposes committee of the T.U.C. had decided that one union for each industry could not be the basis for the reformation of the Eritish trade union movement. I+ would seem that although the committees recognised that a process of gradually tuilding up joint working arrangements, federations, and where possible amalgmations, was slow and unsatisfactory, they considered that the great upheaval involved was too high a prices to pay for the more general introduction of industrial unionimn,

The bulletin gocs on to say that it would like to see, as the typical pattern in an individual industry, "a single employers! federation covering the great majority of firms in that industry and negotiating with a single industrial union with the great majority of workers in membership."

← Constructional Engineering Union Chairman for Union AmalgamationBank Employees call for 35 hour week →

Something wrong on this page?