International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

Giving "both sides" the Daily Worker way

The Bulletin Vol. 2, No. 2, 12 January 1963 · pp. 6-7 of the scan · 289 words

The scan: tb-v02n02-12-jan-1963.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the issue's contents list (match 0.94).

The Daily Worker of Jan 8th carriod reports of tho polemic between Russia and China. To show its impartiality, apparently, it placed extracts from the Pravda article “Let us strengthen the unity of the Communist movement for the triumph of Peace and Socialism" side by sido with extracts from the Rod Flag article Leninism and Modern Revisionism, However there was a diffcrence; whereas the Pravda article was given 30 column inches, the Red Flag piece had less than Il column inches, seg

13 The Chineso Communist Party leadership havé followed their blast at

Togliatti with tw rore salvyoos in their ideological war against the "modern revisionists" i,6., the Krushchevy leadership. The first 1963 issue of Red Flag, the fortnightly journal published by the Contral Committee of the Chinese CP,, containing “"Leninism and Modern Revisionism" and "Revolutionary Dialectica and how to appraise imperialism". The latter is mainly a defence of Mao's “paper tiger" theses, but the former is an all-round attack on “Modern Revisionism" and contains an answer to the Krushchey charge of certain people "sliding into Trotskyist positions", Tyo quotations will suffice to illustrate thisg " We are in favour of compromisvewhich are in the interests of the people's cause and against those that are in the nature of treachery. It is perfactly clear that only those who are guilty now of adventurism, now of capitulationism, are the ones whose ideology is Trotskyism or Trotskyism in & new guise." Later the article goes on “In fact, shortly after Lenin's death 4» serious strugule between larxist-Leninistsand anti-llarxist—Leninista arose in the international conmmimnist movement, That was the strugzis between on the one hand, the Leninists, headed by Stalin, and on the other hand, Trotsky, Bukharin, and other'Left! advonturists and right opportunists."

← Structural Reform' theories apposed in British C•P•New Zealand and Indonesian C.P. delegation in China →

Something wrong on this page?