International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

'neo-colonialist" Character of Common Market Exposed

International Bulletin Vol. 1, No. 48, 24 November 1962 · p. 3 of the scan · 198 words

The scan: ib-v01n48-nov-24-1962.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.

from IM. (London)

Speaking at the opening of a three-day forum on Latin America held in Brussels by the International Union of Christian Entrepeneurs on November 21st., Dr. Raul Prebisch, U.N. Under-Secretary in charge of the Economic Commission for Latin America, accused the Common llarket of hampering Latin American trade. He pointed out that restrictive measures by importing countries had aggravated the downward trend in the prices of primary products. As a result, the purchasing power of Latin America's exports fell from $58 per head in 1930 to $39 im 1960. ven in the period 1955: to 1960. the terms of trade worsened so mich that Latin America's income fell in real terms by some $7,300 million. Pointing out that income per head in Latin America had risen barely 1 per cent a year recently, Dr. Prebisch saidsThe problem is no longer how to avoid an economic and social rev-— olution, but how to channel the revolutionary forces." Upon Britain joining the Common Market its neo-colonialist character would be greatly intensified. Already the world biggest importer of raw materials, it would then have such a proportion of this trade that it could dictate almost whatever terms it wanted.

← Sweden to Work Out Real Un Mployment FiguresElection Deadline for Britain's Entry Into the Common Market →

Something wrong on this page?