Controvarsy Cvur Border War Continues in Daily Worker

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.

The polemic between the pro-Indims and the pro-Chinese in the columns of the lettcrs section of the Daily Worker continues. On Monday, 5th November, 4 more letters on the subject appeared: the first from R. Bevan, London. N.W.3, is unambiguously on the side of China, seeing the hand of America is the affairs; tho next from 5.0. Maitland, Foltham, starts "The Chinese may have a case — I don't kmoweee"§ Sharaf Athar Ali of London 5.8.19, criticise China and India for taking away territory from India; Muricl Seltman of London: N.4., says the answer lies "in the declining influence of the Congress.Party....and...thc need to alionatioc tho Indain massos from the C.P....." Friday's D.W. contained another 6 lettors; e@ anti--Chinese from Leeds and London S.W., 3 pro-Chinese from Dagenham, Kontom and lianchester, and one from former oppositionist lionty Johnstone pro-ieadorship,